Abstract
In this article, I offer an ethnographic examination of neoliberal techniques of control through absence by the Israeli military, the state institution most associated with discipline, indoctrination, and direct coercion. I highlight the ways that the apparent withdrawal of the state from practices of indoctrination and the punishment of conscientious objectors are accompanied by a shift in recruitment and training that emphasizes self-advancement and social mobility above national and ideological commitments. While in the past the Israeli state and military focused exclusively on shaping self-sacrificing citizens, today it invests a great deal of its effort in structuring the calculated choices of self-interested individuals toward favorable outcomes. I explore the uneven but strategic deployment of incentivized governance and consider some of the effects of these techniques for the meaning of engaged citizenship and the politics of state violence in a militarized society. Further, I demonstrate that the lightening of disciplinary sanctions in favor of individual freedom is an effective form of weakening dissent and that it confounds efforts to constitute organized resistance to militarism, leaving activists floundering to find effective ways to express their political concerns.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 91-103 |
Number of pages | 13 |
Journal | American Anthropologist |
Volume | 118 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 1 Mar 2016 |
Keywords
- Governance
- Israel
- Military
- Neoliberalism
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Anthropology
- Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)