Imposed institutions and preferences for redistribution

Alberto Chong, Mark Gradstein

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

To what extent do imposed institutions shape preferences? We consider this issue by comparing the market-versus-state attitudes of respondents from a capitalist country, Finland, and from an ex-communist group of Baltic countries, and by arguing that the period of communist rule can be viewed as an 'experiment' in institutional imposition. We find that, consistent with some earlier related work, citizens from ex-communist countries tend to be more supportive of state ownership than respondents from capitalist economies. However, they also favour increasing inequality and competition as the means to enhance incentives. We conclude that, in some important relevant dimensions, institutional imposition (which lasted for about 50 years) had a limited effect on preferences.

Original languageAmerican English
Pages (from-to)127-156
Number of pages30
JournalJournal of Institutional Economics
Volume14
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Feb 2018

Keywords

  • D02
  • D30
  • I31
  • JEL Classification P30
  • P51

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • General Economics,Econometrics and Finance

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Imposed institutions and preferences for redistribution'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this