Abstract
We evaluate the impact of system installation types, cell material and tracking strategies on the evaluation metrics of PV systems such as energy payback time (EPBT), return factor (ERF) and CO2 emissions offset. As candidate power producing systems we consider a range of PV cell materials, different tracking strategies, as well as concentrating photovoltaic. We conclude that utilizing existing structures significantly reduces the energy payback time of flat-plate PV. High-efficiency concentrating PV installations yielded the shortest EPBT, the highest ERF and the largest life-cycle CO 2 offsets. Considering the use of land, we find that a greater life-cycle energy return and carbon offset per unit land area is yielded by locally-integrated non-concentrating systems.
| Original language | American English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | 30th ISES Biennial Solar World Congress 2011, SWC 2011 |
| Pages | 4284-4294 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| State | Published - 1 Dec 2011 |
| Event | 30th ISES Biennial Solar World Congress 2011, SWC 2011 - Kassel, Germany Duration: 28 Aug 2011 → 2 Sep 2011 |
Publication series
| Name | 30th ISES Biennial Solar World Congress 2011, SWC 2011 |
|---|---|
| Volume | 6 |
Conference
| Conference | 30th ISES Biennial Solar World Congress 2011, SWC 2011 |
|---|---|
| Country/Territory | Germany |
| City | Kassel |
| Period | 28/08/11 → 2/09/11 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy
-
SDG 13 Climate Action
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Impact of cell technology, installation types and scales on energy evaluation metrics of PV systems'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver