Abstract
The paper deals with the early Yogācāra strategies for explaining intersubjective agreement under a ‘mere representations’ view. Examining Vasubandhu, Asaṅga, and Sthiramati’s use of the example of intersubjective agreement among the hungry ghosts (pretas), it is demonstrated that in contrast to the way in which it was often interpreted by contemporary scholars, this example in fact served these Yogācāra thinkers to perform an ironic inversion of the realist premise—showing that intersubjective agreement not only does not require the existence of mind-independent objects but is in fact incompatible with their existence. By delineating the phenomenological complexity underlying this account, the paper then proceeds to unpack the emergent Yogācāra account of intersubjectivity, its implications on the understanding of being, the life-world, and alterity, arguing that it proposes a radical revision of the way we conceive of the ‘shared’ and ‘private’ distinction in respect to experiences, both ordinarily and philosophically.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 337-354 |
| Number of pages | 18 |
| Journal | Sophia |
| Volume | 56 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1 Jun 2017 |
Keywords
- Asaṅga
- Buddhism
- Cosmology
- Hell
- Intersubjectivity
- Personal identity
- Sthiramati
- Vasubandhu
- Yogācāra
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Religious studies
- Philosophy
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Imagine Being a Preta: Early Indian Yogācāra Approaches to Intersubjectivity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver