Abstract
Laws concerning the theft of a farm animal presented between Exod 21:37 and 22:2b are interrupted in order to present the case of thief who is caught in the act of breaking in or afterwards (22:1–2a). Although this interruption has often been regarded as a secondary interpolation,¹ it may be no more than a digression on the subject of homicide in connection with an act of theft.² In making an argument for an interpretation of the law somewhat different from the usual one, I shall maintain that this digression manifests a pattern of legal thought that is established in...
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Ben Porat Yosef |
| Subtitle of host publication | Studies in the Bible and Its World, Essays in Honor of Joseph Fleishman |
| Editors | Michael Avioz, Omer Minka, Yael Shemesh |
| Place of Publication | Münster |
| Pages | 35-41 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2019 |
Publication series
| Name | Alter Orient und Altes Testament |
|---|---|
| Volume | 458 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
RAMBI Publication
- rambi
- Bible -- Exodus -- XXII, 2 -- Criticism, interpretation, etc
- Jewish law -- Biblical teaching
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of '"If the sun shone on him" (Exodus 22:2): a different approach'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver