Abstract
The literature on environmental security often stresses the complementarity between sustainability and broader security goals. Less emphasis has been placed on possible trade-offs between security objectives and aspects of sustainability. This study examines the conditions under which these synergies and trade-offs are likely to occur, and how the trade-offs can be reconciled, especially during times of peacebuilding. As a case study, we analyse the effect of Israeli security concerns on environmental infrastructure designed to treat wastewater in the West Bank. This study identifies several sustainability–security trade-offs: (1) economic—in which security concerns raise costs of wastewater infrastructure, thereby crowding-out other potentially productive investments; (2) equity—in which security concerns result in disproportionate exposure of populations to environmental hazards; and (3) environmental—in which security concerns increase ecological footprints. Yet, our case study also indicates that both sides used a variety of creative measures to reconcile these trade-offs.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1358-1369 |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| Journal | Hydrological Sciences Journal |
| Volume | 61 |
| Issue number | 7 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 30 Apr 2016 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 6 Clean Water and Sanitation
-
SDG 9 Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
-
SDG 17 Partnerships for the Goals
Keywords
- Israeli-Palestinian conflict
- Security
- Sustainability
- Wastewater treatment
- Water
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Water Science and Technology
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Identifying synergies and trade-offs in the sustainability–security nexus: The case of the israeli–palestinian wastewater treatment regime'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver