HOW TO THEORIZE ABOUT STATISTICAL EVIDENCE (AND REALLY, ABOUT EVERYTHING ELSE): A COMMENT ON ALLEN

David Enoch

doi:https://doi.org/10.33115/udg_bib/qf.i2.22455

HOW TO THEORIZE ABOUT STATISTICAL EVIDENCE (AND REALLY, ABOUT EVERYTHING ELSE): A COMMENT ON ALLEN

David Enoch

The Hebrew University of Jerusalem

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

In responding to Prof. Allen’s paper, I make several general methodological points: about the use of hypothetical cases, about the point of theorizing, and about the role of idealization. Then I make some more specific points about his claims about (and against) previous work on statistical evidence.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	285-298
Number of pages	14
Journal	Quaestio Facti
Volume	2021
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.33115/udg_bib/qf.i2.22455
State	Published - 2021

Keywords

legal epistemology
legal theory
statistical evidence

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Law

Access to Document

https://doi.org/10.33115/udg_bib/qf.i2.22455

Cite this

@article{d822c1e0d0ba40ab8258bf19fac8b59a,

title = "HOW TO THEORIZE ABOUT STATISTICAL EVIDENCE (AND REALLY, ABOUT EVERYTHING ELSE): A COMMENT ON ALLEN",

abstract = "In responding to Prof. Allen{\textquoteright}s paper, I make several general methodological points: about the use of hypothetical cases, about the point of theorizing, and about the role of idealization. Then I make some more specific points about his claims about (and against) previous work on statistical evidence.",

keywords = "legal epistemology, legal theory, statistical evidence",

author = "David Enoch",

year = "2021",

doi = "https://doi.org/10.33115/udg_bib/qf.i2.22455",

language = "الإنجليزيّة",

volume = "2021",

pages = "285--298",

journal = "Quaestio Facti",

issn = "2660-4515",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - HOW TO THEORIZE ABOUT STATISTICAL EVIDENCE (AND REALLY, ABOUT EVERYTHING ELSE)

T2 - A COMMENT ON ALLEN

AU - Enoch, David

PY - 2021

Y1 - 2021

N2 - In responding to Prof. Allen’s paper, I make several general methodological points: about the use of hypothetical cases, about the point of theorizing, and about the role of idealization. Then I make some more specific points about his claims about (and against) previous work on statistical evidence.

AB - In responding to Prof. Allen’s paper, I make several general methodological points: about the use of hypothetical cases, about the point of theorizing, and about the role of idealization. Then I make some more specific points about his claims about (and against) previous work on statistical evidence.

KW - legal epistemology

KW - legal theory

KW - statistical evidence

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85163868136&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - https://doi.org/10.33115/udg_bib/qf.i2.22455

DO - https://doi.org/10.33115/udg_bib/qf.i2.22455

M3 - مقالة

SN - 2660-4515

VL - 2021

SP - 285

EP - 298

JO - Quaestio Facti

JF - Quaestio Facti

IS - 2

ER -

HOW TO THEORIZE ABOUT STATISTICAL EVIDENCE (AND REALLY, ABOUT EVERYTHING ELSE): A COMMENT ON ALLEN

Abstract

Keywords

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this