Abstract
This paper suggests a new approach to analyzing the causes of franchise extension. Based on a new dataset, it provides a detailed econometric study of the Great Reform Act of 1832 in the United Kingdom. The analysis yields four main results. First, modernization theory receives limited support. Second, the reform enjoyed some measure of popular support. Third, the threat of revolution had an asymmetric impact on the voting behavior of the pro-reform Whigs and the anti-reform Tories. While the threat might have convinced reluctant reformers among the Whig politicians-and among their patrons-to support the bill, it seems to have hardened the resistance to reform among the Tories. Fourth, ideology played a critical role. Nevertheless, it also appears that self-interest and political expedience explained the votes of many Members of Parliament.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 229-250 |
Number of pages | 22 |
Journal | Public Choice |
Volume | 155 |
Issue number | 3-4 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Jun 2013 |
Keywords
- Democratization
- Franchise extension
- The Great Reform Act
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Sociology and Political Science
- Economics and Econometrics