How Naive Is Contentful Moral Perception?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

According to contentful moral perception (CMP), moral properties can be perceived in the same sense as tables, tigers, and tomatoes. Recently, Heather Logue (2012) has distinguished between two potential ways of perceiving a property. A Kantian Property (KP) in perception is one in which a perceiver’s access involves a detection of the property via a representational vehicle. A Berkeleyan Property (BP) in perception is one in which a perceiver’s access to the property involves that property as partly constitutive of the experience itself. In this paper, I set aside generalized arguments in favor of one view or another, and instead ask whether proponents of CMP have reasons to understand moral perception as Kantian or Berkeleyan. I explore three possible explanatory differences—(a) explaining the intrinsic motivating force of moral perceptions, (b) providing a metasemantics for moral properties, and (c) providing an epistemology of the normative authority of moral properties.

Original languageAmerican English
Article number49
JournalPhilosophies
Volume8
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2023

Keywords

  • moral perception
  • naive realism
  • normative authority
  • representationalism

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Philosophy
  • History and Philosophy of Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'How Naive Is Contentful Moral Perception?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this