TY - GEN
T1 - Homophily and the glass ceiling effect in social networks
AU - Avin, Chen
AU - Keller, Barbara
AU - Lotker, Zvi
AU - Mathieu, Claire
AU - Peleg, David
AU - Pignolet, Yvonne Anne
N1 - Funding Information: Funding for the study was provided by Forest Laboratories, Inc. Funding for editorial assistance was provided by Forest Laboratories, Inc. Funding Information: D. E. L. serves as a speaker for Forest Laboratories, Inc. and did not receive payment for work on the manuscript. T. M. F. received recent research funding from Cerexa, Inc. (a wholly owned subsidiary of Forest Laboratories, Inc.), Ortho-McNeil, Pfizer, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Gilead and Tibotec. He is also a consultant for Bayer, Cerexa, Inc., GlaxoSmithKline, Ortho-McNeil, Protez/Novartis, Merck, Nabriva, Pfizer and Tetraphase. T. M. F. did not receive payment for work on the manuscript. G. H. T. was an employee of Cerexa, Inc. at the time the work was performed; his company Talbot Advisors LLC is currently a consultant to Cerexa, Inc., but it was not paid for the time G. H. T. spent on manuscript preparation. G. H. T. has an equity interest in Cerexa, Inc. P. B. E., H. D. F., J. L., L. L. and I. A. C. are employees of Cerexa, Inc. D. A. T. was an employee of Cerexa, Inc. at the time the work and analyses were performed. P. B. E., H. D. F., J. L., L. L., I. A. C. and D. A. T. hold stock/stock options in Cerexa, Inc.
PY - 2015/1/11
Y1 - 2015/1/11
N2 - The glass ceiling effect has been defined in a recent US Federal Commission report as "the unseen, yet unbreakable barrier that keeps minorities and women from rising to the upper rungs of the corporate ladder, regardless of their qualifications or achievements". It is well documented that many societies and organizations exhibit a glass ceiling. In this paper we formally define and study the glass ceiling effect in social networks and propose a natural mathematical model, called the biased preferential attachment model, that par- tially explains the causes of the glass ceiling effect. This model consists of a network composed of two types of ver- tices, representing two sub-populations, and accommodates three well known social phenomena: (i) the "rich get richer" mechanism, (ii) a minority-majority partition, and (iii) ho- mophily. We prove that our model exhibits a strong mo- ment glass ceiling effect and that all three conditions are necessary, i.e., removing any one of them will prevent the appearance of a glass ceiling effect. Additionally, we present empirical evidence taken from a mentor-student network of researchers (derived from the DBLP database) that exhibits both a glass ceiling effect and the above three phenomena.
AB - The glass ceiling effect has been defined in a recent US Federal Commission report as "the unseen, yet unbreakable barrier that keeps minorities and women from rising to the upper rungs of the corporate ladder, regardless of their qualifications or achievements". It is well documented that many societies and organizations exhibit a glass ceiling. In this paper we formally define and study the glass ceiling effect in social networks and propose a natural mathematical model, called the biased preferential attachment model, that par- tially explains the causes of the glass ceiling effect. This model consists of a network composed of two types of ver- tices, representing two sub-populations, and accommodates three well known social phenomena: (i) the "rich get richer" mechanism, (ii) a minority-majority partition, and (iii) ho- mophily. We prove that our model exhibits a strong mo- ment glass ceiling effect and that all three conditions are necessary, i.e., removing any one of them will prevent the appearance of a glass ceiling effect. Additionally, we present empirical evidence taken from a mentor-student network of researchers (derived from the DBLP database) that exhibits both a glass ceiling effect and the above three phenomena.
KW - Glass ceiling
KW - Homophily
KW - Social networks
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84961318431&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1145/2688073.2688097
DO - https://doi.org/10.1145/2688073.2688097
M3 - Conference contribution
T3 - ITCS 2015 - Proceedings of the 6th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science
SP - 41
EP - 50
BT - ITCS 2015 - Proceedings of the 6th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science
T2 - 6th Conference on Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science, ITCS 2015
Y2 - 11 January 2015 through 13 January 2015
ER -