Historical analogies under dispute: Reactions of Israeli Jews to analogies between the Holocaust and the plight of African asylum seekers in Israel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This article examines the characteristics that shape different public reactions to analogies of historical events while emphasizing the role of national identity. It analyzes responses by Israeli Jews to comparisons between the situation of African asylum seekers in Israel and Jews during the Holocaust via a letter written by Holocaust survivors against the proposed forced deportation of asylum seekers in 2018. A population-based survey experiment conducted during Holocaust Remembrance Day was used to evaluate whether attitudes toward the expulsion of asylum seekers were affected by the analogy. The findings showed differential responses to the analogy, including acceptance, rejection, and ambivalence, which demographic characteristics, unlike aspects of national identity, do not explain. It was also found that participation in Holocaust Remembrance Day commemorations was positively related to acceptance of the analogy. The overall conclusion is that responses to historical analogy are determined more by an individual’s identity and not by demographic factors.

Original languageAmerican English
Pages (from-to)1011-1026
Number of pages16
JournalMemory Studies
Volume15
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Oct 2022

Keywords

  • Holocaust
  • Israel
  • historical analogies
  • national identity
  • survey experiment

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Cultural Studies
  • Social Psychology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Historical analogies under dispute: Reactions of Israeli Jews to analogies between the Holocaust and the plight of African asylum seekers in Israel'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this