High efficiency error suppression for accurate detection of low-frequency variants

Ting Ting Wang, Sagi Abelson, Jinfeng Zou, Tiantian Li, Zhen Zhao, John E. Dick, Liran I. Shlush, Trevor J. Pugh, Scott V. Bratman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Detection of cancer-associated somatic mutations has broad applications for oncology and precision medicine. However, this becomes challenging when cancer-derived DNA is in low abundance, such as in impure tissue specimens or in circulating cell-free DNA. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is particularly prone to technical artefacts that can limit the accuracy for calling low-allele-frequency mutations. State-of-the-art methods to improve detection of low-frequency mutations often employ unique molecular identifiers (UMIs) for error suppression; however, these methods are highly inefficient as they depend on redundant sequencing to assemble consensus sequences. Here, we present a novel strategy to enhance the efficiency of UMI-based error suppression by retaining single reads (singletons) that can participate in consensus assembly. This 'Singleton Correction' methodology outperformed other UMI-based strategies in efficiency, leading to greater sensitivity with high specificity in a cell line dilution series. Significant benefits were seen with Singleton Correction at sequencing depths 300 individuals whose peripheral blood DNA was subjected to hybrid capture sequencing at similar to 5000x depth. Singleton Correction can be incorporated into existing UMI-based error suppression workflows to boost mutation detection accuracy, thus improving the cost-effectiveness and clinical impact of NGS.

Original languageEnglish
Article number87
Number of pages11
JournalNucleic acids research
Volume47
Issue number15
DOIs
StatePublished - 5 Sep 2019

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Genetics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'High efficiency error suppression for accurate detection of low-frequency variants'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this