Health system decision makers' feedback on summaries and tools supporting the use of systematic reviews: A qualitative study

Moriah E. Ellen; John N. Lavis; Michael G. Wilson; Jeremy Grimshaw; R. Brian Haynes; Mathieu Ouimet; Parminder Raina; Russell Gruen

doi:10.1332/174426514X672362

Health system decision makers' feedback on summaries and tools supporting the use of systematic reviews: A qualitative study

Moriah E. Ellen, John N. Lavis, Michael G. Wilson, Jeremy Grimshaw, R. Brian Haynes, Mathieu Ouimet, Parminder Raina, Russell Gruen

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

Abstract

Health system managers and policy makers need timely access to high quality, policy-relevant systematic reviews. Our objectives were to obtain managers' and policy makers' feedback about user-friendly summaries of systematic reviews and about tools related to supporting or assessing their use. Our interviews identified that participants prefer key messages up front, such as details regarding background, methods, and applicability, appreciate quality ratings, and prefer bullets and tables to paragraphs. There were mixed views about the relevance-assessment tool and positive views about the use-assessment tool. The findings can be used to support evidence-informed decision making among managers and policy makers.

Original language	American English
Pages (from-to)	337-359
Number of pages	23
Journal	Evidence and Policy
Volume	10
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1332/174426514X672362
State	Published - 1 Aug 2014
Externally published	Yes

Keywords

Healthcare policy
Knowledge translation
Systematic review

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Access to Document

10.1332/174426514X672362

Cite this

@article{4647992b14934c8d9f59b0de3ad2f3a7,

title = "Health system decision makers' feedback on summaries and tools supporting the use of systematic reviews: A qualitative study",

abstract = "Health system managers and policy makers need timely access to high quality, policy-relevant systematic reviews. Our objectives were to obtain managers' and policy makers' feedback about user-friendly summaries of systematic reviews and about tools related to supporting or assessing their use. Our interviews identified that participants prefer key messages up front, such as details regarding background, methods, and applicability, appreciate quality ratings, and prefer bullets and tables to paragraphs. There were mixed views about the relevance-assessment tool and positive views about the use-assessment tool. The findings can be used to support evidence-informed decision making among managers and policy makers.",

keywords = "Healthcare policy, Knowledge translation, Systematic review",

author = "Ellen, {Moriah E.} and Lavis, {John N.} and Wilson, {Michael G.} and Jeremy Grimshaw and Haynes, {R. Brian} and Mathieu Ouimet and Parminder Raina and Russell Gruen",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} Policy Press 2014.",

year = "2014",

month = aug,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1332/174426514X672362",

language = "American English",

volume = "10",

pages = "337--359",

journal = "Evidence and Policy",

issn = "1744-2648",

publisher = "Policy Press",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Health system decision makers' feedback on summaries and tools supporting the use of systematic reviews

T2 - A qualitative study

AU - Ellen, Moriah E.

AU - Lavis, John N.

AU - Wilson, Michael G.

AU - Grimshaw, Jeremy

AU - Haynes, R. Brian

AU - Ouimet, Mathieu

AU - Raina, Parminder

AU - Gruen, Russell

PY - 2014/8/1

Y1 - 2014/8/1

N2 - Health system managers and policy makers need timely access to high quality, policy-relevant systematic reviews. Our objectives were to obtain managers' and policy makers' feedback about user-friendly summaries of systematic reviews and about tools related to supporting or assessing their use. Our interviews identified that participants prefer key messages up front, such as details regarding background, methods, and applicability, appreciate quality ratings, and prefer bullets and tables to paragraphs. There were mixed views about the relevance-assessment tool and positive views about the use-assessment tool. The findings can be used to support evidence-informed decision making among managers and policy makers.

AB - Health system managers and policy makers need timely access to high quality, policy-relevant systematic reviews. Our objectives were to obtain managers' and policy makers' feedback about user-friendly summaries of systematic reviews and about tools related to supporting or assessing their use. Our interviews identified that participants prefer key messages up front, such as details regarding background, methods, and applicability, appreciate quality ratings, and prefer bullets and tables to paragraphs. There were mixed views about the relevance-assessment tool and positive views about the use-assessment tool. The findings can be used to support evidence-informed decision making among managers and policy makers.

KW - Healthcare policy

KW - Knowledge translation

KW - Systematic review

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84907003216&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1332/174426514X672362

DO - 10.1332/174426514X672362

M3 - Review article

SN - 1744-2648

VL - 10

SP - 337

EP - 359

JO - Evidence and Policy

JF - Evidence and Policy

IS - 3

ER -

Health system decision makers' feedback on summaries and tools supporting the use of systematic reviews: A qualitative study

Abstract

Keywords

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this