Abstract
How can hard determinism deal with the need to punish, when coupled with the obligation to be just? I argue that even though hard determinists might find it morally permissible to incarcerate wrongdoers apart from lawful society, they are committed to the punishment's taking a very different form from common practice in contemporary Western societies. Hard determinists are in fact committed to what I will call funishment, instead of punishment. But, by its nature funishment is a practical reductio of hard determinism: it makes implementing hard determinism impossible to contemplate. Indeed, the social practices that hard determinism requires turn out to be morally bad even according to hard determinism itself. I conclude by briefly reflecting upon the implications.
Original language | American English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 353-367 |
Number of pages | 15 |
Journal | Landscape Ecology |
Volume | 26 |
Issue number | 5 |
State | Published - May 2011 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Geography, Planning and Development
- Ecology
- Nature and Landscape Conservation