Group Bonding and Effectiveness: Cohesion’s Moderating Role and Leaders’ Relationship Mediating Role

Motti Klang; Gil Luria

doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496420977915

Group Bonding and Effectiveness: Cohesion’s Moderating Role and Leaders’ Relationship Mediating Role

Motti Klang, Gil Luria

Department of Human Services

University of Haifa

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

The role of group bonding (friendship ties among group members) and the relationships between group members and the formal leader in the prediction of effectiveness was studied. A theoretical mediated-moderation process model was tested. The model was examined through a longitudinal research with 91 natural groups, that included social network analysis to capture the relationship between group members and a leadership differentiation measure to revel their relationship with the leader. As hypothesized, group bonding predicted group effectiveness, group cohesion mediated only one dimension of group effectiveness, and leadership differentiation moderated this process.

Original language	American English
Pages (from-to)	431-456
Number of pages	26
Journal	Small Group Research
Volume	52
Issue number	4
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496420977915
State	Published - Aug 2021

Keywords

group bonding
group cohesion
group effectiveness
leadership differentiation

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Social Psychology
Applied Psychology

Access to Document

https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496420977915

Cite this

@article{4caffa787c824389b29e8afd6175c965,

title = "Group Bonding and Effectiveness: Cohesion{\textquoteright}s Moderating Role and Leaders{\textquoteright} Relationship Mediating Role",

abstract = "The role of group bonding (friendship ties among group members) and the relationships between group members and the formal leader in the prediction of effectiveness was studied. A theoretical mediated-moderation process model was tested. The model was examined through a longitudinal research with 91 natural groups, that included social network analysis to capture the relationship between group members and a leadership differentiation measure to revel their relationship with the leader. As hypothesized, group bonding predicted group effectiveness, group cohesion mediated only one dimension of group effectiveness, and leadership differentiation moderated this process.",

keywords = "group bonding, group cohesion, group effectiveness, leadership differentiation",

author = "Motti Klang and Gil Luria",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} The Author(s) 2020.",

year = "2021",

month = aug,

doi = "https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496420977915",

language = "American English",

volume = "52",

pages = "431--456",

journal = "Small Group Research",

issn = "1046-4964",

publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Group Bonding and Effectiveness

T2 - Cohesion’s Moderating Role and Leaders’ Relationship Mediating Role

AU - Klang, Motti

AU - Luria, Gil

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © The Author(s) 2020.

PY - 2021/8

Y1 - 2021/8

N2 - The role of group bonding (friendship ties among group members) and the relationships between group members and the formal leader in the prediction of effectiveness was studied. A theoretical mediated-moderation process model was tested. The model was examined through a longitudinal research with 91 natural groups, that included social network analysis to capture the relationship between group members and a leadership differentiation measure to revel their relationship with the leader. As hypothesized, group bonding predicted group effectiveness, group cohesion mediated only one dimension of group effectiveness, and leadership differentiation moderated this process.

AB - The role of group bonding (friendship ties among group members) and the relationships between group members and the formal leader in the prediction of effectiveness was studied. A theoretical mediated-moderation process model was tested. The model was examined through a longitudinal research with 91 natural groups, that included social network analysis to capture the relationship between group members and a leadership differentiation measure to revel their relationship with the leader. As hypothesized, group bonding predicted group effectiveness, group cohesion mediated only one dimension of group effectiveness, and leadership differentiation moderated this process.

KW - group bonding

KW - group cohesion

KW - group effectiveness

KW - leadership differentiation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85097130567&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496420977915

DO - https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496420977915

M3 - Article

SN - 1046-4964

VL - 52

SP - 431

EP - 456

JO - Small Group Research

JF - Small Group Research

IS - 4

ER -

Group Bonding and Effectiveness: Cohesion’s Moderating Role and Leaders’ Relationship Mediating Role

Abstract

Keywords

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this