TY - JOUR
T1 - Geometrical Structure of Bifurcations during Spatial Decision-Making
AU - Gorbonos, Dan
AU - Gov, Nir S.
AU - Couzin, Iain D.
N1 - N.S.G. is the incumbent of the Lee and William Abramowitz Professorial Chair of Biophysics. This research is made possible in part by the historic generosity of the Harold Perlman Family. D.G. and I.D.C. acknowledge support from the Office of Naval Research Grant No. N0001419-1-2556, Germany's Excellence Strategy-EXC 2117-422037984, and the Max Planck Society, Horizon Europe, PathFinder European Innovation Council Work Programme (Grant Agreement No. 101098722) as well as the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie Grant Agreement (No. 860949).
PY - 2024/2/13
Y1 - 2024/2/13
N2 - Animals must constantly make decisions on the move, such as when choosing among multiple options, or “targets,” in space. Recent evidence suggests that this results from a recursive feedback between the (vectorial) neural representation of the targets and the resulting motion defined by this consensus, which then changes the egocentric neural representation of the options, and so on. Here we employ a simple model of this process both to explore how its dynamics accounts for the experimentally observed abruptly branching trajectories exhibited by animals during spatial decision-making, and to provide new insights into spatiotemporal computation. Essential neural dynamics, notably local excitation and long-range inhibition, are captured in our model via spin-system dynamics, with groups of Ising-spins representing neural “activity bumps” corresponding to target directions (as in a neural ring-attractor network, for example). Analysis, employing a novel “mean-field trajectory” approach, reveals the nature of the spontaneous symmetry breaking bifurcations in the model that result in literal bifurcations in trajectory space—and how it results in new geometric principles for spatiotemporal decision-making. We find that all bifurcation points, beyond the very first, fall on a small number of “bifurcation curves.” It is the spatial organization of these curves that is shown to be key to determining the shape of the trajectories, such as self-similar or space filling, exhibited during decision-making, irrespective of the trajectory's starting point. Furthermore, we find that a non-Euclidean (neural) representation of space (effectively an elliptic geometry) considerably reduces the number of bifurcation points in many geometrical configurations (including from an infinite number to only three), preventing endless indecision and promoting effective spatial decision-making. This suggests that a non-Euclidean neural representation of space may be expected to have evolved across species in order to facilitate spatial decision-making.
AB - Animals must constantly make decisions on the move, such as when choosing among multiple options, or “targets,” in space. Recent evidence suggests that this results from a recursive feedback between the (vectorial) neural representation of the targets and the resulting motion defined by this consensus, which then changes the egocentric neural representation of the options, and so on. Here we employ a simple model of this process both to explore how its dynamics accounts for the experimentally observed abruptly branching trajectories exhibited by animals during spatial decision-making, and to provide new insights into spatiotemporal computation. Essential neural dynamics, notably local excitation and long-range inhibition, are captured in our model via spin-system dynamics, with groups of Ising-spins representing neural “activity bumps” corresponding to target directions (as in a neural ring-attractor network, for example). Analysis, employing a novel “mean-field trajectory” approach, reveals the nature of the spontaneous symmetry breaking bifurcations in the model that result in literal bifurcations in trajectory space—and how it results in new geometric principles for spatiotemporal decision-making. We find that all bifurcation points, beyond the very first, fall on a small number of “bifurcation curves.” It is the spatial organization of these curves that is shown to be key to determining the shape of the trajectories, such as self-similar or space filling, exhibited during decision-making, irrespective of the trajectory's starting point. Furthermore, we find that a non-Euclidean (neural) representation of space (effectively an elliptic geometry) considerably reduces the number of bifurcation points in many geometrical configurations (including from an infinite number to only three), preventing endless indecision and promoting effective spatial decision-making. This suggests that a non-Euclidean neural representation of space may be expected to have evolved across species in order to facilitate spatial decision-making.
U2 - 10.1103/PRXLife.2.013008
DO - 10.1103/PRXLife.2.013008
M3 - مقالة
SN - 2835-8279
VL - 2
JO - PRX Life
JF - PRX Life
IS - 1
M1 - 013008
ER -