TY - GEN
T1 - Generalized comparison trees for point-location problems
AU - Kane, Daniel M.
AU - Lovett, Shachar
AU - Moran, Shay
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2018 Schloss Dagstuhl- Leibniz-Zentrum fur Informatik GmbH, Dagstuhl Publishing. All rights reserved.
PY - 2018/7/1
Y1 - 2018/7/1
N2 - Let H be an arbitrary family of hyper-planes in d-dimensions. We show that the point-location problem for H can be solved by a linear decision tree that only uses a special type of queries called generalized comparison queries. These queries correspond to hyperplanes that can be written as a linear combination of two hyperplanes from H; in particular, if all hyperplanes in H are k-sparse then generalized comparisons are 2k-sparse. The depth of the obtained linear decision tree is polynomial in d and logarithmic in |H|, which is comparable to previous results in the literature that use general linear queries. This extends the study of comparison trees from a previous work by the authors [Kane et al., FOCS 2017]. The main benefit is that using generalized comparison queries allows to overcome limitations that apply for the more restricted type of comparison queries. Our analysis combines a seminal result of Forster regarding sets in isotropic position [Forster, JCSS 2002], the margin-based inference dimension analysis for comparison queries from [Kane et al., FOCS 2017], and compactness arguments.
AB - Let H be an arbitrary family of hyper-planes in d-dimensions. We show that the point-location problem for H can be solved by a linear decision tree that only uses a special type of queries called generalized comparison queries. These queries correspond to hyperplanes that can be written as a linear combination of two hyperplanes from H; in particular, if all hyperplanes in H are k-sparse then generalized comparisons are 2k-sparse. The depth of the obtained linear decision tree is polynomial in d and logarithmic in |H|, which is comparable to previous results in the literature that use general linear queries. This extends the study of comparison trees from a previous work by the authors [Kane et al., FOCS 2017]. The main benefit is that using generalized comparison queries allows to overcome limitations that apply for the more restricted type of comparison queries. Our analysis combines a seminal result of Forster regarding sets in isotropic position [Forster, JCSS 2002], the margin-based inference dimension analysis for comparison queries from [Kane et al., FOCS 2017], and compactness arguments.
KW - Comparison queries
KW - Linear decision trees
KW - Point location problems
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049770757&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2018.82
DO - 10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2018.82
M3 - منشور من مؤتمر
T3 - Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics, LIPIcs
BT - 45th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming, ICALP 2018
A2 - Kaklamanis, Christos
A2 - Marx, Daniel
A2 - Chatzigiannakis, Ioannis
A2 - Sannella, Donald
T2 - 45th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming, ICALP 2018
Y2 - 9 July 2018 through 13 July 2018
ER -