Gender blindness in the research on the economic value of education: Theoretical and methodological causes and consequences

Hadas Mandel, Assaf Rotman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

A thorough ‘sociological reading’ in one of the most important, high-profile, and extensive literatures, the research on the economic value of education, reveals its failed to acknowledge women's lower education premiums, as well as the rise in gender inequality in education premiums over-time. This neglect is surprising because the economic value of education is a hot topic that has attracted major scholarly attention in recent decades due to its relation to the expansion of income inequality in postindustrial economies. It also has significant implications for understanding the mechanisms underpinning gender inequality in modern labor markets that rely on workers’ education and skills. Our analysis 1) sheds light on this omission, 2) identifies its theoretical and methodological sources, 3) reveals its consequences by presenting comparative evidence on trends in gender inequality in education premium (based on US-CPS data from the years 1980–2023), and 4) offers a gender-sensitive approach for future studies. The data and literature analyses have significant empirical and theoretical implications. Empirically, they highlight the widening gender gap in educational premiums. Theoretically, the findings contribute to the sociology of knowledge by demonstrating how the theoretical framework, and consequently the research questions and methodology, shape our empirical knowledge.

Original languageEnglish
Article number101049
JournalResearch in Social Stratification and Mobility
Volume97
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2025

Keywords

  • Education premiums
  • Gender blindness
  • Gender inequality
  • Returns to education
  • Returns to schooling

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Gender blindness in the research on the economic value of education: Theoretical and methodological causes and consequences'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this