Forum shopping between civil and shari’a courts: Maintenance suits in contemporary Jerusalem

Ido Shahar

doi:https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137318343_9

Forum shopping between civil and shari’a courts: Maintenance suits in contemporary Jerusalem

Ido Shahar

Department of Middle Eastern and Islamic Studies

University of Haifa

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter › peer-review

Abstract

Forum shopping," namely "[t]he practice of choosing the most favourable jurisdiction or court in which a claim may be heard" (Garner, 2001, p. 590), is highly prevalent in situations of legal pluralism. In such situations, actors are often able to choose between several legal forums, and tend to prefer the forum that they perceive as best serving their interests. Surprisingly, this practice has received but meager attention in anthropological studies of legal pluralism.

Original language	American English
Title of host publication	Religion in Disputes
Subtitle of host publication	Pervasiveness of Religious Normativity in Disputing Processes
Pages	147-164
Number of pages	18
ISBN (Electronic)	9781137318343
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137318343_9
State	Published - 1 Jan 2013

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

General Arts and Humanities
General Social Sciences

Access to Document

https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137318343_9

Cite this

@inbook{b985256e5c96478e85c879b51b118918,

title = "Forum shopping between civil and shari{\textquoteright}a courts: Maintenance suits in contemporary Jerusalem",

abstract = "Forum shopping,{"} namely {"}[t]he practice of choosing the most favourable jurisdiction or court in which a claim may be heard{"} (Garner, 2001, p. 590), is highly prevalent in situations of legal pluralism. In such situations, actors are often able to choose between several legal forums, and tend to prefer the forum that they perceive as best serving their interests. Surprisingly, this practice has received but meager attention in anthropological studies of legal pluralism.",

author = "Ido Shahar",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} Franz von Benda-Beckmann, Keebet von Benda-Beckmann.",

year = "2013",

month = jan,

day = "1",

doi = "https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137318343_9",

language = "American English",

isbn = "9781137322043",

pages = "147--164",

booktitle = "Religion in Disputes",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Forum shopping between civil and shari’a courts

T2 - Maintenance suits in contemporary Jerusalem

AU - Shahar, Ido

PY - 2013/1/1

Y1 - 2013/1/1

N2 - Forum shopping," namely "[t]he practice of choosing the most favourable jurisdiction or court in which a claim may be heard" (Garner, 2001, p. 590), is highly prevalent in situations of legal pluralism. In such situations, actors are often able to choose between several legal forums, and tend to prefer the forum that they perceive as best serving their interests. Surprisingly, this practice has received but meager attention in anthropological studies of legal pluralism.

AB - Forum shopping," namely "[t]he practice of choosing the most favourable jurisdiction or court in which a claim may be heard" (Garner, 2001, p. 590), is highly prevalent in situations of legal pluralism. In such situations, actors are often able to choose between several legal forums, and tend to prefer the forum that they perceive as best serving their interests. Surprisingly, this practice has received but meager attention in anthropological studies of legal pluralism.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85014363544&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137318343_9

DO - https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137318343_9

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9781137322043

SP - 147

EP - 164

BT - Religion in Disputes

ER -

Forum shopping between civil and shari’a courts: Maintenance suits in contemporary Jerusalem

Abstract

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this