Abstract
Aim To assess the common practices for evaluating and treating febrile infants aged ≤60 days in a nationwide survey. Methods Questionnaires were administrated to inpatient paediatric departments in all 25 hospitals in Israel. Results Of the 25 centres surveyed (100% response rate), only 36% had written protocols concerning the approach to young febrile infants. The existence of a written protocol was significantly associated with the level of medical centre (tertiary versus primary and secondary, p = 0.041) and with the number of local paediatric infectious disease specialists (p = 0.034). In 13 (52%) hospitals, a normal white blood cell count was defined as 5000-15 000 cells/mL and 20 (80%) centres use C-reactive protein. Hospitalisation was mandatory in most (96%) centres for all neonates aged ≤28 days. Low-risk infants aged 29-60 days were hospitalised in 68.4% of the primary and secondary hospitals, compared with 33.3% tertiary centres. Ampicillin and gentamicin was the routine empiric antibiotic treatment for febrile infant in 92% of centres. Conclusion Significant differences exist among centres in the evaluation of febrile infants aged ≤60 days exist. These differences reflect the lack of, and highlight the need for, national or international guidelines for the evaluation of fever in this age group.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 379-385 |
Number of pages | 7 |
Journal | Acta Paediatrica, International Journal of Paediatrics |
Volume | 103 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Apr 2014 |
Keywords
- Bacteremia
- National survey
- Neonatal fever
- Rochester criteria
- Sepsis work-up
- Serious bacterial infection
- Urinary tract infection
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health