TY - JOUR
T1 - External shading in buildings
T2 - comparative analysis of daylighting performance in static and kinetic operation scenarios
AU - Grobman, Jacob
AU - Capeluto, Isaac Guedi
AU - Austern, Guy
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2016 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2017/3/4
Y1 - 2017/3/4
N2 - The paper presents a new enumerative method and tool to quantify and compare the potential contribution of kinetic and static external shading elements in buildings, in terms of dynamic measurement of daylighting. The suggested method and tool may help designers to examine the impact of various louver design and operation alternatives in the early stages of the design process. It also allows comparing the potential contribution of different dynamic louver movement scenarios to internal illuminance. This can help designers to better evaluate and compare different dynamic systems, which can be more cost effective. The method and tool are tested on a case study of an office building in a Mediterranean climate, by calculating and comparing the values of useful daylight internal illuminances in static, seasonally adjusted and dynamic louver setup scenarios in comparison to those without louvers. The results of the case study illustrate the contribution of the suggested method and tool to designing for high useful daylight levels. The case study’s illuminance evaluation shows an increase of −1.82% to 7.99%, −1.4% to 11.67% and 10.86% to 33.6% in level of the adapted useful daylight illuminances in static, seasonally adjusted and dynamic external shadings scenarios correspondingly in comparison to the no external shading scenario.
AB - The paper presents a new enumerative method and tool to quantify and compare the potential contribution of kinetic and static external shading elements in buildings, in terms of dynamic measurement of daylighting. The suggested method and tool may help designers to examine the impact of various louver design and operation alternatives in the early stages of the design process. It also allows comparing the potential contribution of different dynamic louver movement scenarios to internal illuminance. This can help designers to better evaluate and compare different dynamic systems, which can be more cost effective. The method and tool are tested on a case study of an office building in a Mediterranean climate, by calculating and comparing the values of useful daylight internal illuminances in static, seasonally adjusted and dynamic louver setup scenarios in comparison to those without louvers. The results of the case study illustrate the contribution of the suggested method and tool to designing for high useful daylight levels. The case study’s illuminance evaluation shows an increase of −1.82% to 7.99%, −1.4% to 11.67% and 10.86% to 33.6% in level of the adapted useful daylight illuminances in static, seasonally adjusted and dynamic external shadings scenarios correspondingly in comparison to the no external shading scenario.
KW - External shading
KW - parametric design
KW - useful daylight illuminances
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85006868342&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1080/00038628.2016.1266991
DO - https://doi.org/10.1080/00038628.2016.1266991
M3 - مقالة
SN - 0003-8628
VL - 60
SP - 126
EP - 136
JO - Architectural Science Review
JF - Architectural Science Review
IS - 2
ER -