Abstract
The Exploration-Exploitation tradeoff arises in Reinforcement Learning when one cannot tell if a policy is optimal. Then, there is a constant need to explore new actions instead of exploiting past experience. In practice, it is common to resolve the tradeoff by using a fixed exploration mechanism, such as ɛ-greedy exploration or by adding Gaus-sian noise, while still trying to learn an optimal policy. In this work, we take a different approach and study exploration-conscious criteria, that result in optimal policies with respect to the explo-ration mechanism. Solving these criteria, as we establish, amounts to solving a surrogate Markov Decision Process. We continue and analyze properties of exploration-conscious optimal policies and characterize two general approaches to solve such criteria. Building on the approaches, we apply simple changes in existing tabular and deep Reinforcement Learning algorithms and empirically demonstrate superior performance relatively to their non-exploration-conscious counterparts, both for discrete and continuous action spaces.
| Original language | English GB |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 5680-5689 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Journal | Proceedings of Machine Learning Research |
| Volume | 97 |
| State | Published - 2019 |
| Event | 36th International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2019 - Long Beach, United States Duration: 9 Jun 2019 → 15 Jun 2019 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Software
- Control and Systems Engineering
- Statistics and Probability
- Artificial Intelligence
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Exploration Conscious Reinforcement Learning Revisited'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver