Evolutionary Tradeoffs between Economy and Effectiveness in Biological Homeostasis Systems

Pablo Szekely, Hila Sheftel, Avi Mayo, Uri Alon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


Biological regulatory systems face a fundamental tradeoff: they must be effective but at the same time also economical. For example, regulatory systems that are designed to repair damage must be effective in reducing damage, but economical in not making too many repair proteins because making excessive proteins carries a fitness cost to the cell, called protein burden. In order to see how biological systems compromise between the two tasks of effectiveness and economy, we applied an approach from economics and engineering called Pareto optimality. This approach allows calculating the best-compromise systems that optimally combine the two tasks. We used a simple and general model for regulation, known as integral feedback, and showed that best-compromise systems have particular combinations of biochemical parameters that control the response rate and basal level. We find that the optimal systems fall on a curve in parameter space. Due to this feature, even if one is able to measure only a small fraction of the system's parameters, one can infer the rest. We applied this approach to estimate parameters in three biological systems: response to heat shock and response to DNA damage in bacteria, and calcium homeostasis in mammals.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere1003163
JournalPLoS Computational Biology
Issue number8
StatePublished - Aug 2013

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Genetics
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
  • Molecular Biology
  • Ecology
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics
  • Modelling and Simulation


Dive into the research topics of 'Evolutionary Tradeoffs between Economy and Effectiveness in Biological Homeostasis Systems'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this