TY - JOUR
T1 - Evolution in students' understanding of thermal physics with increasing complexity
AU - Langbeheim, Elon
AU - Safran, Samuel
AU - Livne, Shelly
AU - Yerushalmi, Edit
N1 - Israel Science Foundation; Schmidt Minerva Center; Perlman family FoundationThe course on soft matter is a collaboration of the School of Contemporary Science at the Davidson Institute of Science Education and the Department of Science Teaching at the Weizmann Institute of Science. S.A.S. is grateful to the Israel Science Foundation and the Schmidt Minerva Center as well as to the Perlman family Foundation for their historic generosity and support of science. We wish to thank Avi Golan, Avi Hofstein, and Bat-Sheva Eylon for their ongoing support of the program, Yehuda Roth, Ron Blonder, Benny Geiger, and Anat Yarden for assistance in the initial stages of the project, and David Andelman, Ernesto Joselevic, and Jacob Klein for guest lectures. Most importantly, we thank the high school students who participated in the soft matter course, especially Ruben and Simon for the pleasure of teaching them and learning from them so much.
PY - 2013/11/12
Y1 - 2013/11/12
N2 - We analyze the development in students’ understanding of fundamental principles in the context of learning a current interdisciplinary research topic—soft matter—that was adapted to the level of high school students. The topic was introduced in a program for interested 11th grade high school students majoring in chemistry and/or physics, in an off-school setting. Soft matter was presented in a gradual increase in the degree of complexity of the phenomena as well as in the level of the quantitative analysis. We describe the evolution in students’ use of fundamental thermodynamics principles to reason about phase separation—a phenomenon that is ubiquitous in soft matter. In particular, we examine the impact of the use of free energy analysis, a common approach in soft matter, on the understanding of the fundamental principles of thermodynamics. The study used diagnostic questions and classroom observations to gauge the student’s learning. In order to gain insight on the aspects that shape the understanding of the basic principles, we focus on the responses and explanations of two case-study students who represent two trends of evolution in conceptual understanding in the group. We analyze changes in the two case studies’ management of conceptual resources used in their analysis of phase separation, and suggest how their prior knowledge and epistemological framing (a combination of their personal tendencies and their prior exposure to different learning styles) affect their conceptual evolution. Finally, we propose strategies to improve the instruction of these concepts.
AB - We analyze the development in students’ understanding of fundamental principles in the context of learning a current interdisciplinary research topic—soft matter—that was adapted to the level of high school students. The topic was introduced in a program for interested 11th grade high school students majoring in chemistry and/or physics, in an off-school setting. Soft matter was presented in a gradual increase in the degree of complexity of the phenomena as well as in the level of the quantitative analysis. We describe the evolution in students’ use of fundamental thermodynamics principles to reason about phase separation—a phenomenon that is ubiquitous in soft matter. In particular, we examine the impact of the use of free energy analysis, a common approach in soft matter, on the understanding of the fundamental principles of thermodynamics. The study used diagnostic questions and classroom observations to gauge the student’s learning. In order to gain insight on the aspects that shape the understanding of the basic principles, we focus on the responses and explanations of two case-study students who represent two trends of evolution in conceptual understanding in the group. We analyze changes in the two case studies’ management of conceptual resources used in their analysis of phase separation, and suggest how their prior knowledge and epistemological framing (a combination of their personal tendencies and their prior exposure to different learning styles) affect their conceptual evolution. Finally, we propose strategies to improve the instruction of these concepts.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84890465271&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.9.020117
DO - 10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.9.020117
M3 - مقالة
SN - 1554-9178
VL - 9
JO - Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research
JF - Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research
IS - 2
M1 - 020117
ER -