TY - JOUR
T1 - Evaluating calibration methods for predicting soil available nutrients using hyperspectral VNIR data
AU - Qi, Haijun
AU - Paz-Kagan, Tarin
AU - Karnieli, Arnon
AU - Jin, Xiu
AU - Li, Shaowen
N1 - Funding Information: The assistance of Liu Zhao, Wencai Wang and Youhua Ma in soil sampling and laboratory physicochemical analysis are gratefully acknowledged. This study has been financed by the International S&T Cooperation Project of the China Ministry of Agriculture ( 2015-Z44 , 2016-X34 ). The authors also appreciate the financial support received by Haijun Qi from the China Scholarship Council ( 201608340066 ). Appendix A Publisher Copyright: © 2017 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2018/1/1
Y1 - 2018/1/1
N2 - Soil nutrients, including available nitrogen (N), phosphorous (P), and potassium (K), are critical properties for monitoring soil fertility and function. Spectroscopy analysis has proven to be a rapid and effective means for predicting soil properties, in general, and NPK, in particular. However, different calibration methods, including preprocessing transformations (PPTs) and regression algorithms (RAs), considerably affect the performance of prediction models. In this study, raw spectrum and 21 PPTs, combined with three RAs, for a total of 66 calibration methods, were investigated for modeling and predicting soil NPK using hyperspectral VNIR data (400–1000 nm). The ratio of performance to deviation (RPD) of validation set was selected to evaluate the prediction accuracy and the ratio between the interpretable sum squared deviation and the real sum squared deviation (SSR/SST) of the validation set was also used to evaluate the explanatory power of the models. It was found that there is a tradeoff between RPD and SSR/SST values; under this tradeoff, the multiplicative scatter correction, combined with the back-propagation neural network, was preferred for predicting P (RPD = 2.23, SSR/SST = 0.81). The Savitzky-Golay filtering + logarithmic transformation, combined with the partial least squares – regression, was preferred for predicting K (RPD = 1.47, SSR/SST = 0.95). However, with extremely low RPD and SSR/SST values, the prediction of N was unreliable in this study. The evaluation approach presented in this paper suggests a framework for choosing a calibration method for spectroscopy analysis for predicting soil NPK and perhaps some other properties.
AB - Soil nutrients, including available nitrogen (N), phosphorous (P), and potassium (K), are critical properties for monitoring soil fertility and function. Spectroscopy analysis has proven to be a rapid and effective means for predicting soil properties, in general, and NPK, in particular. However, different calibration methods, including preprocessing transformations (PPTs) and regression algorithms (RAs), considerably affect the performance of prediction models. In this study, raw spectrum and 21 PPTs, combined with three RAs, for a total of 66 calibration methods, were investigated for modeling and predicting soil NPK using hyperspectral VNIR data (400–1000 nm). The ratio of performance to deviation (RPD) of validation set was selected to evaluate the prediction accuracy and the ratio between the interpretable sum squared deviation and the real sum squared deviation (SSR/SST) of the validation set was also used to evaluate the explanatory power of the models. It was found that there is a tradeoff between RPD and SSR/SST values; under this tradeoff, the multiplicative scatter correction, combined with the back-propagation neural network, was preferred for predicting P (RPD = 2.23, SSR/SST = 0.81). The Savitzky-Golay filtering + logarithmic transformation, combined with the partial least squares – regression, was preferred for predicting K (RPD = 1.47, SSR/SST = 0.95). However, with extremely low RPD and SSR/SST values, the prediction of N was unreliable in this study. The evaluation approach presented in this paper suggests a framework for choosing a calibration method for spectroscopy analysis for predicting soil NPK and perhaps some other properties.
KW - Calibration
KW - Prediction methods
KW - Regression algorithms
KW - Soil measurements
KW - Spectral analysis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85030719542&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2017.09.006
DO - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2017.09.006
M3 - Article
SN - 0167-1987
VL - 175
SP - 267
EP - 275
JO - Soil and Tillage Research
JF - Soil and Tillage Research
ER -