ETH hardness for densest-k-Subgraph with perfect completeness

Mark Braverman, Young Kun Ko, Aviad Rubinstein, Omri Weinstein

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

Abstract

We show that, assuming the (deterministic) Exponential Time Hypothesis, distinguishing between a graph with an induced k-clique and a graph in which all k-subgraphs have density at most 1- ϵ, requires n (log n) time. Our result essentially matches the quasi-polynomial algorithms of Feige and Seltser [FS97] and Barman [Bar15] for this problem, and is the first one to rule out an additive PTAS for Densest k-Subgraph. We further strengthen this result by showing that our lower bound continues to hold when, in the soundness case, even subgraphs smaller by a near-polynomial factor (ko = k 2 (log n)) are assumed to be at most (1 - ϵ)-dense. Our reduction is inspired by recent applications of the birthday repetition technique [AIM14, BKW15]. Our analysis relies on information theoretical machinery and is similar in spirit to analyzing a parallel repetition of two- prover games in which the provers may choose to answer some challenges multiple times, while completely ignoring other challenges.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publication28th Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, SODA 2017
EditorsPhilip N. Klein
Pages1326-1341
Number of pages16
ISBN (Electronic)9781611974782
DOIs
StatePublished - 2017
Externally publishedYes
Event28th Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, SODA 2017 - Barcelona, Spain
Duration: 16 Jan 201719 Jan 2017

Publication series

NameProceedings of the Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms
Volume0

Conference

Conference28th Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, SODA 2017
Country/TerritorySpain
CityBarcelona
Period16/01/1719/01/17

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Software
  • General Mathematics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'ETH hardness for densest-k-Subgraph with perfect completeness'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this