Abstract
We have noticed that some of the supernova peak magnitudes in Table 1 are given in the wrong rows. The error affected the rows ‘PS1-11ap’ to ‘PS1-10ky’, with each magnitude displaced downwards by one cell. The nature of this error is purely typographic. Originally, the objects were grouped into high- and low-redshift bins, rather than by wavelength coverage; the error occurred when moving PS1-11ap from the high-z group into the ‘Gold’ coverage group. This does not affect any of the other tables, figures, or analysis in the paper.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | stw124 |
| Pages (from-to) | 2514-2515 |
| Number of pages | 2 |
| Journal | MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY |
| Volume | 457 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| Early online date | 11 Feb 2016 |
| DOIs |
|
| State | Published - 11 Apr 2016 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Astronomy and Astrophysics
- Space and Planetary Science
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Erratum : On the diversity of superluminous supernovae: ejected mass as the dominant factor (vol 452, pg 3869, 2015)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver