TY - JOUR
T1 - Enhanced Efficiency of Electrostatically Actuated Bistable Microswitches Using Bow-Like Operation
AU - Medina, Lior
AU - Gilat, Rivka
AU - Krylov, Slava
N1 - Funding Information: Manuscript received October 26, 2019; accepted January 21, 2020. Date of publication February 20, 2020; date of current version October 14, 2020. Recommended by Technical Editor J.-Y. Chang. The work of L. Medina was supported by the Blavatnik postdoctoral fellowship. The work of S. Krylov was supported by the Henry and Dinah Krongold Chair of Microelectronics. This work was supported in part by the Israel Ministry of Science, Technology and Space (MOST) under Grant 3-12369 and in part by the Israel Science Foundation (ISF) under Grant 1272/16. (Corresponding author: Lior Medina.) Lior Medina is with the Nanoscience Centre, Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB3 0FF, U.K. (e-mail: [email protected]).
PY - 2020/10
Y1 - 2020/10
N2 - To induce snap-through (ST) switching in an electrostatically actuated bistable latchable curved microbeam, a close gap electrode facing the concave surface of the beam is commonly used. In the framework of an alternative architecture considered here, the electrode is placed in front of the convex (backward), rather than concave (forward) side of a beam. The initially curved stress free beam is activated by an electrostatic force pulling it quasistatically in the backward direction, away from the desired buckled configuration. Once the voltage is turned off, the accumulated strain energy is released, and the beam is catapulted toward the buckled state, similarly to an arrow fired by a bow. In the case where the beam exhibits latching, the device may remain in its buckled state indefinitely under zero voltage. The beam can also be snapped back (released), by applying a voltage to the same electrode. In this article, the efficiency of this bow-like actuation is estimated. By means of a reduced order model, it is shown that due to the nonlinearity of the electrostatic force, the suggested operation scenario may lead to a 54${\%}$ reduction in the ST switching voltage, when compared to the traditional forward actuation. As a result, the device allows bidirectional switching by using a single electrode, and can be viewed as a micromechanical realization of a toggle flip-flop element.
AB - To induce snap-through (ST) switching in an electrostatically actuated bistable latchable curved microbeam, a close gap electrode facing the concave surface of the beam is commonly used. In the framework of an alternative architecture considered here, the electrode is placed in front of the convex (backward), rather than concave (forward) side of a beam. The initially curved stress free beam is activated by an electrostatic force pulling it quasistatically in the backward direction, away from the desired buckled configuration. Once the voltage is turned off, the accumulated strain energy is released, and the beam is catapulted toward the buckled state, similarly to an arrow fired by a bow. In the case where the beam exhibits latching, the device may remain in its buckled state indefinitely under zero voltage. The beam can also be snapped back (released), by applying a voltage to the same electrode. In this article, the efficiency of this bow-like actuation is estimated. By means of a reduced order model, it is shown that due to the nonlinearity of the electrostatic force, the suggested operation scenario may lead to a 54${\%}$ reduction in the ST switching voltage, when compared to the traditional forward actuation. As a result, the device allows bidirectional switching by using a single electrode, and can be viewed as a micromechanical realization of a toggle flip-flop element.
KW - Bidirectional switching
KW - bistability
KW - curved microbeam
KW - dynamic snap-through
KW - electrostatic actuation
KW - micromechanical flip-flop
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85088443312&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/TMECH.2020.2975190
DO - 10.1109/TMECH.2020.2975190
M3 - مقالة
SN - 1083-4435
VL - 25
SP - 2409
EP - 2415
JO - IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics
JF - IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics
IS - 5
M1 - 9004467
ER -