TY - GEN
T1 - Energy versus data integrity trade-offs in embedded high-density logic compatible dynamic memories
AU - Teman, Adam
AU - Karakonstantis, Georgios
AU - Giterman, Robert
AU - Meinerzhagen, Pascal
AU - Burg, Andreas
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2015 EDAA.
PY - 2015/4/22
Y1 - 2015/4/22
N2 - Current variation aware design methodologies, tuned for worst-case scenarios, are becoming increasingly pessimistic from the perspective of power and performance. A good example of such pessimism is setting the refresh rate of DRAMs according to the worst-case access statistics, thereby resulting in very frequent refresh cycles, which are responsible for the majority of the standby power consumption of these memories. However, such a high refresh rate may not be required, either due to extremely low probability of the actual occurrence of such a worst-case, or due to the inherent error resilient nature of many applications that can tolerate a certain number of potential failures. In this paper, we exploit and quantify the possibilities that exist in dynamic memory design by shifting to the so-called approximate computing paradigm in order to save power and enhance yield at no cost. The statistical characteristics of the retention time in dynamic memories were revealed by studying a fabricated 2kb CMOS compatible embedded DRAM (eDRAM) memory array based on gain-cells. Measurements show that up to 73% of the retention power can be saved by altering the refresh time and setting it such that a small number of failures is allowed. We show that these savings can be further increased by utilizing known circuit techniques, such as body biasing, which can help, not only in extending, but also in preferably shaping the retention time distribution. Our approach is one of the first attempts to access the data integrity and energy tradeoffs achieved in eDRAMs for utilizing them in error resilient applications and can prove helpful in the anticipated shift to approximate computing.
AB - Current variation aware design methodologies, tuned for worst-case scenarios, are becoming increasingly pessimistic from the perspective of power and performance. A good example of such pessimism is setting the refresh rate of DRAMs according to the worst-case access statistics, thereby resulting in very frequent refresh cycles, which are responsible for the majority of the standby power consumption of these memories. However, such a high refresh rate may not be required, either due to extremely low probability of the actual occurrence of such a worst-case, or due to the inherent error resilient nature of many applications that can tolerate a certain number of potential failures. In this paper, we exploit and quantify the possibilities that exist in dynamic memory design by shifting to the so-called approximate computing paradigm in order to save power and enhance yield at no cost. The statistical characteristics of the retention time in dynamic memories were revealed by studying a fabricated 2kb CMOS compatible embedded DRAM (eDRAM) memory array based on gain-cells. Measurements show that up to 73% of the retention power can be saved by altering the refresh time and setting it such that a small number of failures is allowed. We show that these savings can be further increased by utilizing known circuit techniques, such as body biasing, which can help, not only in extending, but also in preferably shaping the retention time distribution. Our approach is one of the first attempts to access the data integrity and energy tradeoffs achieved in eDRAMs for utilizing them in error resilient applications and can prove helpful in the anticipated shift to approximate computing.
KW - DRAM
KW - Data Integrity
KW - Embedded Memories
KW - Energy Efficiency
KW - Error Resilience
KW - Refresh Power
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84945947132&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.7873/date.2015.0783
DO - 10.7873/date.2015.0783
M3 - منشور من مؤتمر
T3 - Proceedings -Design, Automation and Test in Europe, DATE
SP - 489
EP - 494
BT - Proceedings of the 2015 Design, Automation and Test in Europe Conference and Exhibition, DATE 2015
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
T2 - 2015 Design, Automation and Test in Europe Conference and Exhibition, DATE 2015
Y2 - 9 March 2015 through 13 March 2015
ER -