Empirical reconstruction of learning progressions based on teachers’ tagging of didactic metadata

Jason Cooper, Shai Olsher, Michal Yerushalmy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

In their enactment of the curriculum, teachers have a substantial role as instructional designers. Accordingly, any evaluation of the progression of students’ learning should first be concerned with the pedagogical intentions of the teacher. In this article we present a method for reconstructing teachers’ implicit and tacit considerations in their selection, sequencing and enactment of tasks. Two 11th grade teachers tagged all of the tasks that comprised a 5-week learning progression. Tagging consisted of assigning values to prescribed categories of metadata. Visual representations of the metadata revealed patterns in the tagged progressions, and allowed the teachers to reflect upon these patterns. Both teachers, though guided by very different didactical considerations, validated that many of their explicit and implicit intentions were revealed in the representations of the progressions. Furthermore, both teachers had the opportunity to reflect on tacit aspects of their instructional design that they were not previously aware of.

Original languageEnglish
Article number100833
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Mathematical Behavior
Volume61
Early online date17 Dec 2020
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2021

Keywords

  • Didactic tagging
  • Learning progression
  • Learning trajectory
  • Pedagogical design capacity
  • Teacher reflection

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Education
  • Applied Psychology
  • Applied Mathematics
  • Mathematics (miscellaneous)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Empirical reconstruction of learning progressions based on teachers’ tagging of didactic metadata'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this