Effectiveness of integrating individualized and generic complementary medicine treatments with standard care versus standard care alone for reducing preoperative anxiety

Samuel Attias, Lital Keinan Boker, Zahi Arnon, Eran Ben-Arye, Ayala Bar'Am, Gideon Sroka, Ibrahim Matter, Mostafa Somri, Elad Schiff

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Study Objective Preoperative anxiety is commonly reported by people undergoing surgery. A significant number of studies have found a correlation between preoperative anxiety and post-operative morbidity. Various methods of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) were found to be effective in alleviating preoperative anxiety. This study examined the relative effectiveness of various individual and generic CAM methods combined with standard treatment (ST) in relieving preoperative anxiety, in comparison with ST alone. Design Randomized controlled trial. Setting Holding room area Patients Three hundred sixty patients. Interventions Patients were randomly divided into 6 equal-sized groups. Group 1 received the standard treatment (ST) for anxiety alleviation with anxiolytics. The five other groups received the following, together with ST (anxiolytics): Compact Disk Recording of Guided Imagery (CDRGI); acupuncture; individual guided imagery; reflexology; and individual guided imagery combined with reflexology, based on medical staff availability. Measurements Assessment of anxiety was taken upon entering the holding room area (surgery preparation room) ('pre-treatment assessment'), and following the treatment, shortly before transfer to the operating room ('post-treatment assessment'), based on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) questionnaire. Data processing included comparison of VAS averages in the 'pre' and 'post' stages among the various groups. Main Results Preoperatively, CAM treatments were associated with significant reduction of anxiety level (5.54-2.32, p < 0.0001). In contrast, no significant change was noted in the standard treatment group (4.92-5.44, p = 0.15). Individualized CAM treatments did not differ significantly in outcomes. However, CDRGI was less effective than individualized CAM (P < 0.001), but better than ST (p = 0.005). Conclusions Individual CAM treatments integrated within ST reduce preoperative anxiety significantly, compared to standard treatment alone, and are more effective than generic CDRGI. In light of the scope of preoperative anxiety and its implications for public health, integration of CAM therapies with ST should be considered for reducing preoperative anxiety.

Original languageAmerican English
Pages (from-to)54-64
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Clinical Anesthesia
Volume29
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Mar 2016

Keywords

  • Complementary and alternative medicine
  • Holding room area
  • Integrative medicine
  • Preoperative anxiety

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Effectiveness of integrating individualized and generic complementary medicine treatments with standard care versus standard care alone for reducing preoperative anxiety'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this