Drought tolerance mechanisms and aquaporin expression of wild vs. cultivated pear tree species in the field

Indira Paudel, Hadas Gerbi, Annat Zisovich, Gal Sapir, Shifra Ben-Dor, Vlad Brumfeld, Tamir Klein

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Water availability is becoming a limiting factor with increasing world population that challenges global food security. Thus, we need to enhance cultivation in increasingly drier and hotter climate and prepare fruit trees for the ongoing climate change. Wild tree species might offer vital information and plant material in face of these challenges.

A year-long comparative field study was conducted to investigate the mechanisms underlying drought tolerance in pear species (cultivated Pyrus communis and Pyrus pyrifolia vs. the wild Pyrus syriaca).

We confirmed the hypothesis of higher drought tolerance in wild pear compared to its cultivated relative. P. syriaca xylem had fewer, narrower vessels, and lower vulnerability to embolism. It showed higher intrinsic water-sue efficiency and more robust seasonal patterns of photosynthesis, hydraulic conductivity, and PIP (plasma intrinsic protein) aquaporin expression. Across species, we identified a ubiquitous gene (PIP1:5/1:6), nine drought-inhibited genes, and two drought-induced genes (PIP1:4 and 2:6/2:7, confirming previous studies).

Our study highlights the potential of using wild relatives of fruit tree species to prepare key crops to a drier and hotter future. The study of PIPS leads the way to a more focused research of the role of these cellular water channels in minimizing tree water loss under drought, while ensuring hydration of specific tissues.

Original languageEnglish
Article number103832
Number of pages13
JournalEnvironmental and Experimental Botany
Volume167
Early online date31 Jul 2019
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2019

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Drought tolerance mechanisms and aquaporin expression of wild vs. cultivated pear tree species in the field'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this