Abstract
Statistical learning (SL) is typically considered to be a domain-general mechanism by which cognitive systems discover the underlying distributional properties of the input. However, recent studies examining whether there are commonalities in the learning of distributional information across different domains or modalities consistently reveal modality and stimulus specificity. Therefore, important questions are how and why a hypothesized domain-general learning mechanism systematically produces such effects. Here, we offer a theoretical framework according to which SL is not a unitary mechanism, but a set of domain-general computational principles that operate in different modalities and, therefore, are subject to the specific constraints characteristic of their respective brain regions. This framework offers testable predictions and we discuss its computational and neurobiological plausibility.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 117-125 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | Trends in Cognitive Sciences |
| Volume | 19 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2015 |
Keywords
- Domain-general mechanisms
- Modality specificity
- Neurobiologically plausible models
- Statistical learning
- Stimulus specificity
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Cognitive Neuroscience
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Domain generality versus modality specificity: The paradox of statistical learning'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver