Abstract
Scholars over the last several decades have theorized and presented research regarding the key components of a balanced adult life. However, attempts to integrate these components are rare. This paper offers a two-dimensional model for understanding and constructing a balanced adult life: doing–being and relationship–solitude. Thriving by active doing (mastery/accomplishment) and by relationships (collaboration/engagement in positive relationships) comprise two major elements within the common models of well-being (e.g., self-determination theory and the flourish/PERMA theoretical model). However, to live a balanced life, these two socially desirable modes of existence—doing and relationships—must be complemented by being and solitude, respectively, each commanding a markedly lower profile in the literature. The two dimensions are described, followed by a presentation of the four modes generated from these two dimensions: solitary doing, communal doing, solitary being, and communal being. The benefits of each mode are presented and implications of the proposed model are discussed.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1953-1971 |
| Number of pages | 19 |
| Journal | Journal of Happiness Studies |
| Volume | 20 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 15 Aug 2019 |
Keywords
- Doing and being
- Life balance
- Relationship and solitude
- Well-being
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Doing–Being and Relationship–Solitude: A Proposed Model for a Balanced Life'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver