Abstract
It is commonly maintained that neuroplastic mechanisms in the brain provide empirical support for the hypothesis of multiple realizability. We show in various case studies that neuroplasticity stems from preexisting mechanisms and processes inherent in the neural (or biochemical) structure of the brain. We argue that not only does neuroplasticity fail to provide empirical evidence of multiple realization, its inability to do so strengthens the mind-body identity theory. Finally, we argue that a recently proposed identity theory called Flat Physicalism can be enlisted to explain the current state of the mind-body problem more adequately.
| Original language | American English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 107-127 |
| Number of pages | 21 |
| Journal | Philosophy of Science |
| Volume | 89 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2022 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- History
- Philosophy
- History and Philosophy of Science
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Does Neuroplasticity Support the Hypothesis of Multiple Realizability?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver