Abstract
This study investigates the effect of candidates' expenditure on elections' results focusing on run-off elections' data. Our analysis, based on all run-off municipal elections in Israel between 1993 and 2008, shows that candidates' share of the vote is not substantially affected by their campaign spending. This outcome contradicts recent results showing that, in a developing country where voting is compulsory, campaign expenditures have a significant effect on vote shares. Yet, it is in line with the evidence of earlier studies based on developed countries showing that the effect of campaign spending is limited. This leads us to suggest that campaign spending may be effective in developing countries with consolidating democracies because compulsory voting forces the relative poor population to turn out and vote, and this population is relatively more impressionable by campaign spending on media advertisements.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 102-114 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | Electoral Studies |
| Volume | 40 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1 Dec 2015 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 17 Partnerships for the Goals
Keywords
- Campaign spending
- Electoral outcomes
- Quasi-natural experiment
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Political Science and International Relations
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Does campaign spending affect electoral outcomes?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver