Digital remains: property or privacy?

Michael Birnhack, Tal Morse

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

How should the law treat digital remains, namely, digital personal information of deceased people? Two rival conceptions compete over the best framing: property and privacy. Under property framing, digital remains are just another form of assets, subject to succession law; under privacy framing, digital remains are personal data, and upon death, are not part of the estate. However, whether privacy rights survive death is contested. This article distinguishes between four legal categories of digital remains (intangible items, information about property, intellectual property and personal data), unpacks the two rival framings, and argues that the property framework captures the first three categories of digital remains, but not the last. The article examines the argument for posthumous privacy and concludes that at most, the law should protect reasonable expectations of the living regarding their post-mortem condition, subject to balancing them with competing interests and rights of the living.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)280-301
Number of pages22
JournalInternational Journal of Law and Information Technology
Volume30
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2022

Keywords

  • copyright
  • data protection
  • digital remains
  • platforms
  • posthumous privacy
  • property

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Library and Information Sciences
  • Law

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Digital remains: property or privacy?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this