TY - GEN
T1 - Determinacy in discrete-bidding infinite-duration games
AU - Aghajohari, Milad
AU - Avni, Guy
AU - Henzinger, Thomas A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © Milad Aghajohari, Guy Avni, and Thomas A. Henzinger.
PY - 2019/8
Y1 - 2019/8
N2 - In two-player games on graphs, the players move a token through a graph to produce an infinite path, which determines the winner of the game. Such games are central in formal methods since they model the interaction between a non-terminating system and its environment. In bidding games the players bid for the right to move the token: in each round, the players simultaneously submit bids, and the higher bidder moves the token and pays the other player. Bidding games are known to have a clean and elegant mathematical structure that relies on the ability of the players to submit arbitrarily small bids. Many applications, however, require a fixed granularity for the bids, which can represent, for example, the monetary value expressed in cents. We study, for the first time, the combination of discrete-bidding and infinite-duration games. Our most important result proves that these games form a large determined subclass of concurrent games, where determinacy is the strong property that there always exists exactly one player who can guarantee winning the game. In particular, we show that, in contrast to non-discrete bidding games, the mechanism with which tied bids are resolved plays an important role in discrete-bidding games. We study several natural tie-breaking mechanisms and show that, while some do not admit determinacy, most natural mechanisms imply determinacy for every pair of initial budgets.
AB - In two-player games on graphs, the players move a token through a graph to produce an infinite path, which determines the winner of the game. Such games are central in formal methods since they model the interaction between a non-terminating system and its environment. In bidding games the players bid for the right to move the token: in each round, the players simultaneously submit bids, and the higher bidder moves the token and pays the other player. Bidding games are known to have a clean and elegant mathematical structure that relies on the ability of the players to submit arbitrarily small bids. Many applications, however, require a fixed granularity for the bids, which can represent, for example, the monetary value expressed in cents. We study, for the first time, the combination of discrete-bidding and infinite-duration games. Our most important result proves that these games form a large determined subclass of concurrent games, where determinacy is the strong property that there always exists exactly one player who can guarantee winning the game. In particular, we show that, in contrast to non-discrete bidding games, the mechanism with which tied bids are resolved plays an important role in discrete-bidding games. We study several natural tie-breaking mechanisms and show that, while some do not admit determinacy, most natural mechanisms imply determinacy for every pair of initial budgets.
KW - Bidding games
KW - Concurrent games
KW - Determinacy
KW - Discrete bidding
KW - Richman games
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85071607624&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.CONCUR.2019.20
DO - https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.CONCUR.2019.20
M3 - Conference contribution
T3 - Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics, LIPIcs
BT - 30th International Conference on Concurrency Theory, CONCUR 2019
A2 - Fokkink, Wan
A2 - van Glabbeek, Rob
PB - Schloss Dagstuhl- Leibniz-Zentrum fur Informatik GmbH, Dagstuhl Publishing
T2 - 30th International Conference on Concurrency Theory, CONCUR 2019
Y2 - 27 August 2019 through 30 August 2019
ER -