Abstract
Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) are blockchain-based
entities that operate without centralized management or shareholders,
enabling worldwide token holders the option of participating in their
governance through self-executing smart contracts. With approximately
fifty thousand DAOs controlling over $30 billion in assets, these
organizations offer unprecedented efficiency and global collaboration,
enabling stakeholders to participate and contribute to the operation of
DAOs regardless of their jurisdiction or physical presence. DAOs,
however, also present significant legal and regulatory challenges,
particularly concerning liability, contractual enforcement, tax
obligations, and oversight. Their decentralized and fluid structure makes
it substantively difficult for any single country—including powerful
actors such as the United States and the European Union—to assert
jurisdiction or exercise regulatory authority over such organizations. In
addition to governance considerations, the decentralized,
pseudonymous, and borderless structure of DAOs may be exploited for
unlawful purposes, most notably money laundering.
This Article examines how DAOs, particularly within the decentralized
finance sector, facilitate anonymous cross-border transactions that pose
novel and significant money laundering risks. By analyzing existing
regulatory responses in major jurisdictions including the United States
and the European Union, as well as efforts by key international
organizations such as the Financial Action Task Force, the International
Monetary Fund, and the United Nations, the Article demonstrates that
prevailing regulatory frameworks and enforcement models cannot
adequately respond to the distinct challenges presented by DAOs. This
regulatory vacuum poses significant risks to global financial stability,
the integrity of the financial systems, and core national-security
interests, including the prevention of sanctions evasion,
counterterrorism and proliferation financing, and the deduction and
disruption of state-sponsored, cyber-enabled illicit finance. Accordingly, the Article proposes a novel, modular, risk-based, global anti-money
laundering framework tailored to DAOs’ unique operational realities.
The proposed framework aligns with principles of functional
equivalence, technological neutrality, and transnational cooperation,
offering a more effective means of addressing DAO-related, anti-money
laundering risks while preserving space for innovation.
entities that operate without centralized management or shareholders,
enabling worldwide token holders the option of participating in their
governance through self-executing smart contracts. With approximately
fifty thousand DAOs controlling over $30 billion in assets, these
organizations offer unprecedented efficiency and global collaboration,
enabling stakeholders to participate and contribute to the operation of
DAOs regardless of their jurisdiction or physical presence. DAOs,
however, also present significant legal and regulatory challenges,
particularly concerning liability, contractual enforcement, tax
obligations, and oversight. Their decentralized and fluid structure makes
it substantively difficult for any single country—including powerful
actors such as the United States and the European Union—to assert
jurisdiction or exercise regulatory authority over such organizations. In
addition to governance considerations, the decentralized,
pseudonymous, and borderless structure of DAOs may be exploited for
unlawful purposes, most notably money laundering.
This Article examines how DAOs, particularly within the decentralized
finance sector, facilitate anonymous cross-border transactions that pose
novel and significant money laundering risks. By analyzing existing
regulatory responses in major jurisdictions including the United States
and the European Union, as well as efforts by key international
organizations such as the Financial Action Task Force, the International
Monetary Fund, and the United Nations, the Article demonstrates that
prevailing regulatory frameworks and enforcement models cannot
adequately respond to the distinct challenges presented by DAOs. This
regulatory vacuum poses significant risks to global financial stability,
the integrity of the financial systems, and core national-security
interests, including the prevention of sanctions evasion,
counterterrorism and proliferation financing, and the deduction and
disruption of state-sponsored, cyber-enabled illicit finance. Accordingly, the Article proposes a novel, modular, risk-based, global anti-money
laundering framework tailored to DAOs’ unique operational realities.
The proposed framework aligns with principles of functional
equivalence, technological neutrality, and transnational cooperation,
offering a more effective means of addressing DAO-related, anti-money
laundering risks while preserving space for innovation.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1-78 |
| Number of pages | 78 |
| Journal | Harvard national security journal |
| Volume | 17 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| State | Published - 2026 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Decentralized Autonomous Organizations And The Anti-Money Laundering Challenge: Rethinking Global Frameworks for a Leaderless World'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver