Abstract
In a recent article, Hamby advocates the replacement of the “old” Conflict Tactic Scales used to measure physical partner violence (PV) with a new measurement instrument that represents and supports a thesis that gender use of physical PV is asymmetrical rather than symmetrical. This article takes a critical look at the logic, assumptions, arguments, examples, interpretations, and conclusions, presented in Hamby’s article, and in some cases disagrees with them. Furthermore, this article uses Hamby’s proposals as an opportunity to review and examine core issues in the study of perpetration of physical PV, including gender-related theoretical and methodological issues.
| Original language | American English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 134-144 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| Journal | Trauma, Violence, and Abuse |
| Volume | 18 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1 Apr 2017 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 5 Gender Equality
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- domestic violence
- gender symmetry/asymmetry in partner violence
- physical partner violence
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Health(social science)
- Applied Psychology
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Critical Review of Hamby’s (2014) Article Titled “Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Research, Scientific Progress, Scientific Challenges, and Gender”'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver