TY - JOUR
T1 - Corrigendum to “Anaerobic ammonium oxidation coupled to arsenate reduction, a novel biogeochemical process observed in arsenic-contaminated paddy soil” [Geochim. et Cosmochim. Ac., 335 (2022) 11–22, (S0016703722004008), (10.1016/j.gca.2022.08.020)]
AU - Zhang, Miaomiao
AU - Kolton, Max
AU - Häggblom, Max M.
AU - Sun, Xiaoxu
AU - Yu, Ke
AU - He, Bin
AU - Yuan, Zaijian
AU - Dong, Yiran
AU - Su, Xianfa
AU - Chen, Zhenyu
AU - Li, Hui
AU - Xiao, Tangfu
AU - Xiao, Enzong
AU - Sun, Weimin
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2024 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2025/1/1
Y1 - 2025/1/1
N2 - The authors regret that on page 16, the last sentence in the 1st paragraph and the Equations 1-3 of Section 4.1, and on page S3 of the Supplementary Information, the authors have been made aware of an error in the free energy of formation for AsO43- and AsO2-. A mistake in the Gibbs energy values of AsO43- and AsO2- were -55 and -83.66 kJ/mol, which need to be corrected to be -155 and -83.66 kcal/mol, respectively. Unit conversions in the calculation of Equations 1-3 were not performed and produced wrong Δ [Formula presented]value. We present here corrected Δ [Formula presented]value of Equations 1-3 and attached a corrected Supplementary Information as below. Error: Accordingly, we predicted that anaerobic ammonium oxidation coupled to As(V) reduction would also generate N2, NO2-, or NO3- similar to Feammox but would yield more energy through the following reactions (Equations 1-3) (see Supplementary Material for the calculation of Δ [Formula presented]: [Formula presented] [Formula presented] [Formula presented]Corrected: Accordingly, we predicted that anaerobic ammonium oxidation coupled to As(V) reduction would also generate N2, NO2-, or NO3- similar to Feammox and would yield energy through the following reactions (Equations 1-3) (see Supplementary Material for the calculation of Δ [Formula presented]: [Formula presented] [Formula presented] [Formula presented]Though the Gibbs energy need to be corrected, our discussion and conclusion still works. All the three Asammox pathways were energetically favoured (Δ [Formula presented]< 0) and Asammox to N2 stoichiometrically obtained most energy (minimum Δ [Formula presented] among the three pathways. Acknowledgements: We thank Dr. Jan Dolfing (Northumbria University) for his questions which led to the discovery of the error. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.
AB - The authors regret that on page 16, the last sentence in the 1st paragraph and the Equations 1-3 of Section 4.1, and on page S3 of the Supplementary Information, the authors have been made aware of an error in the free energy of formation for AsO43- and AsO2-. A mistake in the Gibbs energy values of AsO43- and AsO2- were -55 and -83.66 kJ/mol, which need to be corrected to be -155 and -83.66 kcal/mol, respectively. Unit conversions in the calculation of Equations 1-3 were not performed and produced wrong Δ [Formula presented]value. We present here corrected Δ [Formula presented]value of Equations 1-3 and attached a corrected Supplementary Information as below. Error: Accordingly, we predicted that anaerobic ammonium oxidation coupled to As(V) reduction would also generate N2, NO2-, or NO3- similar to Feammox but would yield more energy through the following reactions (Equations 1-3) (see Supplementary Material for the calculation of Δ [Formula presented]: [Formula presented] [Formula presented] [Formula presented]Corrected: Accordingly, we predicted that anaerobic ammonium oxidation coupled to As(V) reduction would also generate N2, NO2-, or NO3- similar to Feammox and would yield energy through the following reactions (Equations 1-3) (see Supplementary Material for the calculation of Δ [Formula presented]: [Formula presented] [Formula presented] [Formula presented]Though the Gibbs energy need to be corrected, our discussion and conclusion still works. All the three Asammox pathways were energetically favoured (Δ [Formula presented]< 0) and Asammox to N2 stoichiometrically obtained most energy (minimum Δ [Formula presented] among the three pathways. Acknowledgements: We thank Dr. Jan Dolfing (Northumbria University) for his questions which led to the discovery of the error. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85214232416&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2024.12.017
DO - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2024.12.017
M3 - Comment/debate
SN - 0016-7037
JO - Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta
JF - Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta
ER -