Abstract
In the article “The ‘TranSeq’ 3′-end sequencing method for high-throughput transcriptomics and gene space refinement in plant genomes”, the authors wish to apologize for the inclusion of an erroneous legend to Figure 2 in the above mentioned manuscript. The correct legend is reproduced below. Figure 2. Mapping and Transeq reads to the tomato reference genome (ITAG2.4). (A) Scheme representing the reads obtained from TruSeq (A) and Transeq (B) methods, mapped on a typical gene model. (C–D) Examples of expected alignments of reads to the 3′UTR of typical genes. (E) Example of reads, which were mapped to unexpected locations in gene models (i.e. to exons or introns, rather than to the 3′UTR). (F) Examples of wrongly annotated 3′UTR, depicted as ‘broken’ Transeq reads. (G) Example of ‘orphan reads’, which were mapped to a genomic region where there is no gene predicted.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 796-796 |
Number of pages | 1 |
Journal | Plant Journal |
Volume | 97 |
Issue number | 4 |
Early online date | 27 Feb 2019 |
DOIs |
|
State | Published - Feb 2019 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Genetics
- Plant Science
- Cell Biology