Abstract
In these pages we seek to integrate two claims. First, we argue that, taken to their logical conclusions, the considerations that support a strict form of protection for tangible property rights do not call for a similar form of protection when applied to the case of copyright. More dramatically, these considerations demand, on pain of glaring inconsistency, a substantially weaker protection for copyright. In pursuing this claim, we show that the form of protecting property rights (including rights in tangibles) is, to an important extent, a feature of certain normal, though contingent, facts about the human world. Second, the normative question concerning the selection of a desirable protection for creative works is most naturally pursued from a tort law perspective, in part because the normative structure of copyright law simply is that of tort law.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 4 |
| Pages (from-to) | 59-97 |
| Number of pages | 39 |
| Journal | Theoretical inquiries in law |
| Volume | 12 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 3 Jan 2011 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Law