Abstract
In the context of genetic testing and screening, Germany and Israel generally represent contrasting legal regulations and professional outlooks, particularly in relation to reproductive, prenatal genetic testing and pre-implantation genetic diagnosis (PGD). This chapter locates the national policies regarding adult genetic testing against their cultural backdrop, and discusses the notion of ‘genetic responsibility’. We further focus on two paradigmatic cases of predictive genetic testing for late-onset diseases: Huntington’s disease and colon cancer.
| Original language | American English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | SpringerBriefs in Ethics |
| Publisher | Springer Nature |
| Pages | 45-53 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1 Jan 2016 |
Publication series
| Name | SpringerBriefs in Ethics |
|---|
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- Carrier Screening
- Genetic Responsibility
- Prenatal Genetic Testing
- Sibling Donor
- Spinal Muscular Atrophy
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Philosophy
- Medicine (miscellaneous)
- Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Contextualizing the Cultural and Medico-Legal Debate on Adult Genetic Testing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver