Condemnatory Disappointment

Daniel Telech, Leora Dahan Katz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

When blame is understood to be emotion-based or affective, its emotional tone is standardly identified as one of anger. We argue that this conception of affective blame is overly restrictive. By attending to cases of blame that emerge against a background of a particular kind of hope invested in others, we identify a blaming response characterized not by anger but by sadness: reactive disappointment. We develop an account of reactive disappointment as affective blame, maintaining that while angry blame and disappointed blame are both condemnatory responses, they have distinct evaluative foci and occupy different but complementary roles in our accountability practices.

Original languageAmerican English
Pages (from-to)851-880
Number of pages30
JournalEthics
Volume132
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2022

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Philosophy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Condemnatory Disappointment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this