TY - JOUR
T1 - Concise review
T2 - Workshop review: Understanding and assessing the risks of stem cell-based therapies
AU - Heslop, James A.
AU - Hammond, Thomas G.
AU - Santeramo, Ilaria
AU - Piella, Agnés Tort
AU - Hopp, Isabel
AU - Zhou, Jing
AU - Baty, Roua
AU - Graziano, Enrique I.
AU - Marco, Bernabè Proto
AU - Caron, Alexis
AU - Sköld, Patrik
AU - Andrews, Peter W.
AU - Baxter, Melissa A.
AU - Hay, David C.
AU - Hamdam, Junnat
AU - Sharpe, Michaela E.
AU - Patel, Sara
AU - Jones, David R.
AU - Reinhardt, Jens
AU - Danen, Erik H.J.
AU - Ben-David, Uri
AU - Stacey, Glyn
AU - Björquist, Petter
AU - Piner, Jacqueline
AU - Mills, John
AU - Rowe, Cliff
AU - Pellegrini, Giovanni
AU - Sethu, Swaminathan
AU - Antoine, Daniel J.
AU - Cross, Michael J.
AU - Murray, Patricia
AU - Williams, Dominic P.
AU - Kitteringham, Neil R.
AU - Goldring, Chris E.P.
AU - Goldring, Chris E.P.
AU - Kevin Park, B.
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © AlphaMed Press.
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - The field of stem cell therapeutics is moving ever closer to widespread application in the clinic. However, despite the undoubted potential held by these therapies, the balance between risk and benefit remains difficult to predict. As in any new field, a lack of previous application in man and gaps in the underlying science mean that regulators and investigators continue to look for a balance between minimizing potential risk and ensuring therapies are not needlessly kept from patients. Here, we attempt to identify the important safety issues, assessing the current advances in scientific knowledge and how they may translate to clinical therapeutic strategies in the identification and management of these risks. We also investigate the tools and techniques currently available to researchers during preclinical and clinical development of stem cell products, their utility and limitations, and how these tools may be strategically used in the development of these therapies. We conclude that ensuring safety through cutting-edge science and robust assays, coupled with regular and open discussions between regulators and academic/industrial investigators, is likely to prove the most fruitful route to ensuring the safest possible development of new products.
AB - The field of stem cell therapeutics is moving ever closer to widespread application in the clinic. However, despite the undoubted potential held by these therapies, the balance between risk and benefit remains difficult to predict. As in any new field, a lack of previous application in man and gaps in the underlying science mean that regulators and investigators continue to look for a balance between minimizing potential risk and ensuring therapies are not needlessly kept from patients. Here, we attempt to identify the important safety issues, assessing the current advances in scientific knowledge and how they may translate to clinical therapeutic strategies in the identification and management of these risks. We also investigate the tools and techniques currently available to researchers during preclinical and clinical development of stem cell products, their utility and limitations, and how these tools may be strategically used in the development of these therapies. We conclude that ensuring safety through cutting-edge science and robust assays, coupled with regular and open discussions between regulators and academic/industrial investigators, is likely to prove the most fruitful route to ensuring the safest possible development of new products.
KW - Adult stem cells
KW - Autologous stem cell transplantation
KW - Cellular therapy
KW - In vivo tracking
KW - Pluripotent stem cells
KW - Stem cell
KW - Stem cell expansion
KW - Stem cell transplantation
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84930477917
U2 - 10.5966/sctm.2014-0110
DO - 10.5966/sctm.2014-0110
M3 - Review article
SN - 2157-6564
VL - 4
SP - 389
EP - 400
JO - Stem cells translational medicine
JF - Stem cells translational medicine
IS - 4
ER -