Abstract
We analyze the run-time complexity of computing allocations that are both fair and maximize the utilitarian social welfare, defined as the sum of agents’ utilities. We focus on two tractable fairness concepts: envy-freeness up to one item (EF1) and proportionality up to one item (PROP1). We consider two computational problems: (1) Among the utilitarian-maximal allocations, decide whether there exists one that is also fair; (2) among the fair allocations, compute one that maximizes the utilitarian welfare. We show that both problems are strongly NP-hard when the number of agents is variable, and remain NP-hard for a fixed number of agents greater than two. For the special case of two agents, we find that problem (1) is polynomial-time solvable, while problem (2) remains NP-hard. Finally, with a fixed number of agents, we design pseudopolynomial-time algorithms for both problems. We extend our results to the stronger fairness notions envy-freeness up to any item (EFx) and proportionality up to any item (PROPx).
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 773-784 |
Number of pages | 12 |
Journal | European Journal of Operational Research |
Volume | 307 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 1 Jun 2023 |
Keywords
- Assignment
- Fair division
- Group decisions and negotiations
- Indivisible items
- Utilitarian welfare
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Information Systems and Management
- General Computer Science
- Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
- Modelling and Simulation
- Management Science and Operations Research