Computation revisited in the context of cognitive science

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

Abstract

In this final chapter, we conclude the book with four theses. First, in Section 8.1, we argue that in the course of nontrivial computation, typically, only implicit intrinsic and mathematical representations are processed. Then, in Section 8.2, we argue that any computational explanation of cognition is unintelligible without a commitment to a single interpretation of ‘digital computation’ as defined by a given account thereof. In Section 8.3, we argue that a blanket dismissal of the key role computation plays in cognitive science is unwarranted. We also argue that the thesis that computationalism, connectionism and dynamicism are mutually exclusive is wrong. Finally, in Section 8.4, we conclude with some reflections on the computational nature of cognition and suggest some future research opportunities.

Original languageAmerican English
Title of host publicationStudies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics
Pages197-229
Number of pages33
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2014
Externally publishedYes

Publication series

NameStudies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics
Volume12

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Philosophy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Computation revisited in the context of cognitive science'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this