Comparing Lesion Conspicuity and ADC Reliability in High-resolution Diffusion-weighted Imaging of the Breast

Mami Iima, Rena Nakayama, Masako Kataoka, Martins Otikovs, Noam Nissan, Lucio Frydman, Yuta Urushibata, Maya Honda, Aika Okazawa, Hiroko Satake, Shinji Naganawa, Yuji Nakamoto

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Purpose: This study investigated the breast lesion conspicuity and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) reliability for three different diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) protocols: spatiotemporal encoding (SPEN), single-shot echo-planar imaging (SS-EPI), and readout segmentation of long variable echo-trains (RESOLVE). Methods: Sixty-five women suspected of having breast tumors were included in this study, with 44 lesions (36 malignant, 8 benign) analyzed further. Breast MRI was performed on a 3 Tesla (3T) system (MAGNETOM Prisma, Siemens) equipped with a dedicated 18-channel breast array coil for a phantom and patients. Three DWI protocols-SPEN, SS-EPI, and RESOLVE-were used. SS-EPI was acquired with an in-plane resolution of 2 x 2 mm(2), a slice thickness of 3 mm, and b-values of 0 and 1000 s/mm(2). SPEN had a higher in-plane resolution of 1 x 1 mm(2), a slice thickness of 1.5 mm, and b-values of 0, 850, and 1500 s/mm(2). RESOLVE was acquired with an in-plane resolution of 1 x 1 mm(2), a slice thickness of 1.5 mm, and b-values of 0 and 850 s/mm(2). Lesion conspicuity and ADC values were evaluated. Results: The average lesion conspicuity scores were significantly higher for RESOLVE (3.54 +/- 0.65) than for SPEN (3.07 +/- 0.91) or SS-EPI (2.48 +/- 0.78) (P < 0.01). The SPEN score was significantly higher than the SS-EPI score (P < 0.01). Phantom measurements indicated marginally lower ADC values for SPEN compared to SS-EPI and RESOLVE across all concentrations. The results revealed that SPEN (b = 0, 850, 1500 sec/mm(2)) yielded significantly lower ADC values compared to SPEN (b = 0, 850 sec/mm(2)) in malignant lesions (P < 0.01), with no significant difference observed between SPEN (b = 0, 850 sec/mm(2)), SS-EPI, and RESOLVE. For benign lesions, no significant difference in ADC values was found between SPEN (b = 0, 850 sec/mm(2)), SPEN (b = 0, 850, 1500 sec/mm(2)), SS-EPI, and RESOLVE. Conclusion: RESOLVE provided the highest lesion conspicuity, and ADC values in breast lesions were not significantly different among sequences ranging b values 850-1000 sec/mm(2). SPEN with higher b-values (0, 850, 1500 vs. 0, 850 sec/mm(2)) yielded significantly lower ADC values in malignant lesions, highlighting the importance of b-value selection in ADC quantification.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages5
JournalMagnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences
DOIs
StatePublished Online - 26 Sep 2024

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparing Lesion Conspicuity and ADC Reliability in High-resolution Diffusion-weighted Imaging of the Breast'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this