Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Communication between viruses guides lysis-lysogeny decisions

  • Zohar Erez
  • , Ida Steinberger-Levy
  • , Maya Shamir
  • , Shany Doron
  • , Avihail, Avigail Stokar Avihail
  • , Yoav Peleg
  • , Sarah Melamed
  • , Azita Leavitt
  • , Alon Savidor
  • , Shira Albeck
  • , Gil Amitai
  • , Rotem Sorek

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Temperate viruses can become dormant in their host cells, a process called lysogeny. In every infection, such viruses decide between the lytic and the lysogenic cycles, that is, whether to replicate and lyse their host or to lysogenize and keep the host viable. Here we show that viruses (phages) of the SPbeta group use a small-molecule communication system to coordinate lysis-lysogeny decisions. During infection of its Bacillus host cell, the phage produces a six aminoacids-long communication peptide that is released into the medium. In subsequent infections, progeny phages measure the concentration of this peptide and lysogenize if the concentration is sufficiently high. We found that different phages encode different versions of the communication peptide, demonstrating a phage-specific peptide communication code for lysogeny decisions. We term this communication system the 'arbitrium' system, and further show that it is encoded by three phage genes: aimP, which produces the peptide; aimR, the intracellular peptide receptor; and aimX, a negative regulator of lysogeny. The arbitrium system enables a descendant phage to 'communicate' with its predecessors, that is, to estimate the amount of recent previous infections and hence decide whether to employ the lytic or lysogenic cycle.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)488-493
Number of pages6
JournalNature
Volume541
Issue number7638
Early online date18 Jan 2017
DOIs
StatePublished - 26 Jan 2017

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Communication between viruses guides lysis-lysogeny decisions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this